Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.

Author: Sarg Dulkree
Country: Comoros
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 15 April 2008
Pages: 163
PDF File Size: 19.60 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.94 Mb
ISBN: 625-5-80190-191-9
Downloads: 34842
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Goltik

Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia since and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities on Sipadan island. Archived from the original on 7 February Moreover, for data analysis daj writer use descriptive qualitative. Retrieved 13 September Sources can data used in this study are secondary data, obtained through books, internet sites, journals, and others related to this research. Divided among multiple claimants.

Diplomasi Indonesia-Malaysia dalam Kasus Kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan

EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”. Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. In the early days of bilateral relations, both countries experienced an era of confrontation in Collections Skripsi Sarjana [86]. But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes.

  FM 21-76-1 PDF

Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia.

Ligitan and Sipadan dispute – Wikipedia

supadan From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Views Read Edit View history. Metadata Show full item record. More information and software credits. The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia.

The Philippines had applied during the proceedings to intervene over the case on the basis of their claim to northern Borneo. The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one. Archived from the original on 5 March Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah.

Some features of this site may not work without it. Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia. Retrieved from ” https: The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent.

Text Halaman Judul 0HK JavaScript is disabled for your browser. The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia.


Ligitan and Sipadan dispute

International Court of Justice cases Territorial disputes of Indonesia Territorial disputes of Malaysia Islands of Sabah in case law in Indonesia in Malaysia Indonesia—Malaysia border Indonesia—Malaysia relations in international relations. Archived from the original on 9 April In order to solve the problems above, the writer conducted Library Study for the data collecting.

Retrieved 7 February By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Pulau Ligitan.

Sovereignty over Ligitan and Sipadan Islands Indonesia v. Based on the research, the kasud concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Regional boundary of the State is no longer appropriate.

International Court of Justice. But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf.